The MEO Program formulates, directs, and sustains a comprehensive effort to maximize human potential and to ensure fair treatment for all Soldiers based solely on merit, performance, and potential in support of readiness. MEO philosophy is based on fairness and justice. Commanders are responsible for sustaining a positive Command climate within their units. The goals of the MEO program are to:
The Army is a values-based organization where everyone is expected to do what is right by treating all persons as they should be treated—with dignity and respect. Army personnel are expected to treat all people with respect in all aspects of life and forms of communication (for example, online or in person). Furthermore, Army personnel, especially those entrusted with the mantle of leadership, will lead by example and do what is right to prevent abusive treatment of others. Failure to do so brings discredit on the Army and may have strategic implications. Hazing, bullying, and discriminatory harassment of people or their property is prohibited; allegations of harassment will be addressed swiftly, individually, and in light of their circumstances. Discriminatory harassment undermines trust, violate ethics, and negatively impact command climate and readiness.
Army regulation defines hazing, bullying and discriminatory harassment as follows:
Discrimination is the act, policy, or procedure that arbitrarily denies equal opportunity because of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or sexual orientation to an individual or group of individuals.
The following are types of discrimination apply to the Military Equal Opportunity program as outlined in Army Regulation 600–20 dated 24 July 2020:
The following definition of discrimination types apply to the Military Equal Opportunity program: AR 600–20 dated 24 July 2020:
Terms used to degrade, belittle, insult, or negative statements pertaining to race, color, sex, national origin, or religion. These terms include insults, printed material, visual material, signs, symbols, posters, or insignia. The determining factor whether a term is disparaging is not the intent but the impact it has on the recipient or a reasonable person. The use of these terms may contribute to an unlawful hostile work environment if it occurs with respect to a person’s race, color, sex, national origin, or religion and must not be tolerated.
Treatment that is different and unequal because of race, color, sex, national origin, or religion, or sexual orientation.
A series of acts that are so severe and pervasive as to alter an individual’s work conditions. The acts may be discreet acts which are offensive, intimidating, or abusive to another person using the reasonable person standard. a series of acts that are so severe and pervasive as to alter an individual’s work conditions. The acts may be discreet acts which are offensive, intimidating, or abusive to another person using the reasonable person standard..